“[W]e think Plessy [v. Ferguson] was wrong the day it was decided,” the Joint Opinion of Justices O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter declared in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Plessy, the Joint Opinion explained, had asserted that state enforced separation of the races had nothing to do with racial oppression, and that the perceived offense was merely the fantasy of hypersensitive blacks. This was simply wrong in 1896, and the claim became even more obviously wrong as the years progressed. Therefore it was completely appropriate for the Court to overrule Plessy in 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education
A response to the article Plessy v. Ferguson and the Anti-Canon, by Akhil Amar, published in the N...
A response to the article Plessy v. Ferguson and the Anti-Canon, by Akhil Amar, published in the N...
To say that the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Lochner v. New York is infamous is an understatement....
“[W]e think Plessy [v. Ferguson] was wrong the day it was decided,” the Joint Opinion of Justices O’...
One hundred years after the Supreme Court invalidated a law regulating bakers’ working hours as a vi...
A Review of The Plessy Case: A Legal-Historical Interpretation by Charles A. Lofgre
This article is a contribution to the Lochner Centennial Symposium at Boston University School of La...
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist called Lochner v. New York (1905) “one of the most ill-starred de...
James Fleming argues that “[Justice Clarence] Thomas’s concurrence in Adarand and dissent in Grutter...
For a very long time, it has been an article of faith among liberals and conservatives alike that Lo...
In the landmark case of Plessy v. Ferguson decided in 1896, the Supreme Court of the United States g...
In this brief Foreword to a forthcoming symposium on Lochner v. New York, Professor Randy Barnett as...
At first glance, Separate appears to offer a history of the Supreme Court’s infamous Plessy v. Fergu...
To say that the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Lochner v. New York is infamous is an understatement....
Fifty-eight years separate the 1896 decision in Plessy v. Ferguson from Brown v. Board of Education....
A response to the article Plessy v. Ferguson and the Anti-Canon, by Akhil Amar, published in the N...
A response to the article Plessy v. Ferguson and the Anti-Canon, by Akhil Amar, published in the N...
To say that the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Lochner v. New York is infamous is an understatement....
“[W]e think Plessy [v. Ferguson] was wrong the day it was decided,” the Joint Opinion of Justices O’...
One hundred years after the Supreme Court invalidated a law regulating bakers’ working hours as a vi...
A Review of The Plessy Case: A Legal-Historical Interpretation by Charles A. Lofgre
This article is a contribution to the Lochner Centennial Symposium at Boston University School of La...
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist called Lochner v. New York (1905) “one of the most ill-starred de...
James Fleming argues that “[Justice Clarence] Thomas’s concurrence in Adarand and dissent in Grutter...
For a very long time, it has been an article of faith among liberals and conservatives alike that Lo...
In the landmark case of Plessy v. Ferguson decided in 1896, the Supreme Court of the United States g...
In this brief Foreword to a forthcoming symposium on Lochner v. New York, Professor Randy Barnett as...
At first glance, Separate appears to offer a history of the Supreme Court’s infamous Plessy v. Fergu...
To say that the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Lochner v. New York is infamous is an understatement....
Fifty-eight years separate the 1896 decision in Plessy v. Ferguson from Brown v. Board of Education....
A response to the article Plessy v. Ferguson and the Anti-Canon, by Akhil Amar, published in the N...
A response to the article Plessy v. Ferguson and the Anti-Canon, by Akhil Amar, published in the N...
To say that the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Lochner v. New York is infamous is an understatement....